State v. Fisher

2 Citing cases

  1. Diaz v. State

    992 A.2d 1236 (Del. 2010)

    In this case, Diaz does not deny, nor could he, that he has a record of juvenile adjudications and adult criminal convictions subsequent to his 2004 Family Court adjudication. His subsequent juvenile and adult record is fatal to his petition for expungement.4 We, therefore, find no abuse of the Family Court's discretion in denying his petition without holding a hearing. State v. Fisher, 2006 WL 1374677 (Del. May 17, 2006). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED.

  2. Diaz v. State

    No. 729, 2009 (Del. Mar. 19, 2010)

    In this case, Diaz does not deny, nor could he, that he has a record of juvenile adjudications and adult criminal convictions subsequent to his 2004 Family Court adjudication. His subsequent juvenile and adult record is fatal to his petition for expungement. We, therefore, find no abuse of the Family Court's discretion in denying his petition without holding a hearing. State v. Fisher, 2006 WL 1374677 (Del. May 17, 2006).Lee v. State, 2009 WL 2894315 (Del. Sept. 10, 2009).