State v. Finkle

Full title: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD FINKLE…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 4, 1974

329 A.2d 65 (N.J. 1974)

329 A.2d 65

Opinion

Argued November 18, 1974 —

Decided December 4, 1974.

On appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Harold Finkle, of the New York Bar, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Morgan E. Thomas, attorney).

Mr. Robert A. Rubenfeld, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 128 N.J. Super. 199.

CLIFFORD, J., concurs in the result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and Judge COLLESTER — 7.

For reversal — None.