From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ferguson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1971
479 P.2d 242 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Argued January 18, 1971

Affirmed January 18, 1971

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lane County, DOUGLAS R. SPENCER, Judge.

J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Rhidian M. M. Morgan, Staff Attorney, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FORT, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


This appeal presented no unusual or difficult questions. Having previously studied the briefs, immediately upon conclusion of argument, and after briefly stating to counsel our reasons, we ruled from the bench. Setting forth those reasons in a detailed opinion would add nothing of value to the existing body of judicial precedent. Our ruling was:

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Ferguson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1971
479 P.2d 242 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LARRY RAY FERGUSON, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 18, 1971

Citations

479 P.2d 242 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)
479 P.2d 242