From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Evans

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 29, 2020
2020-UP-119 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2020)

Opinion

2020-UP-119

04-29-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Gene David Evans, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-000365

Appellant Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Gene David Evans, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2020

Appeal From Sumter County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Appellant Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Gene David Evans, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Evans

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 29, 2020
2020-UP-119 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Gene David Evans, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

2020-UP-119 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2020)