State v. Evans

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Gene David Evans, Jr., Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Appellate Case No. 2018-000365 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-000365 Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-119

04-29-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Gene David Evans, Jr., Appellant.

Appellant Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Gene David Evans, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Gene David Evans, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.