State v. Evans

1 Citing case

  1. Howard v. Richard

    Case No. 1:12-cv-867 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2014)   Cited 3 times
    In Howard v. Richard, No. 1:12-cv-867, 2014 WL 358424 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2014), supplementing on reconsideration, 2014 WL 1685902 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2014), the court rejected counsel's argument that he was excused from renewing his motion to sever after the State's case.

    State v. Bickerstaff (1984), 10 Ohio St. 3d 62, 65-66, 10 Ohio B. 352, 461 N.E. 2d 892, quoting State v. Moss (1982), 69 OhioSt. 2d 515, 433 N.E. 2d 181. See also, State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St. 3d 153, 2010 Ohio 6314, 942 N.E. 2d 1061, ¶ 51, and State v. Evans, 1st Dist. No. C-100028, 2011 Ohio 2356.[*P49] The Ohio Supreme Court recently changed the analysis to be applied in allied-offense cases in State v. Johnson, supra 2010 Ohio 6314.