State v. Ervin

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Maunwell J. Ervin, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2013-001656 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-001656 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-427

11-26-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Maunwell J. Ervin, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Greenwood County
Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.