Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

State v. Ellis

476 N.W.2d 662 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
State v. Ellis

3 Citing cases

  1. City of Minneapolis v. Swanson

    No. C5-97-312 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 19, 1997)   Cited 1 times

    City ofRichfield v. Local No. 1215, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters, 276 N.W.2d 42, 45 (Minn. 1979); State v. Ellis, 476 N.W.2d 662, 664 (Minn.App. 1991), review denied (Minn. Dec. 13, 1991).

  2. Arcadia Develop. v. City of Bloomington

    552 N.W.2d 281 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 32 times
    Concluding that the Dolan "rough proportionality" standard did not apply to a city ordinance requiring mobile home park owners to assist residents with relocation costs when the park closed on the grounds that a Dolan analysis is only required for "adjudicative determinations that condition approval of a proposed land use on a property transfer to the government"

    1989). Statutes and local ordinances are presumed valid and will not be declared unconstitutional unless clearly shown to be so. City of St. Paul v. Kekedakis, 293 Minn. 334, 336, 199 N.W.2d 151, 153 (1972); State v. Ellis, 476 N.W.2d 662, 664 (Minn.App. 1991), review denied (Minn. Dec. 13, 1991).

  3. Winn v. Simon

    No. CX-98-428, C4-98-814 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 15, 1998)

    1981) (finding that the district court erred in admitting testimony from a nonlawyer witness that the defendant's conduct violated the National Electrical Safety Code); Pratt v. State, Dep't of Natural Resources, 309 N.W.2d 767, 770 (Minn. 1981) (assuming a nonlawyer witness could testify as to whether certain lakes were public waters according to state statute); State v. Ellis, 476 N.W.2d 662, 666 (Minn.App. 1991) (permitting a nonlawyer housing inspector to testify that conditions violated the housing code), review denied (Minn. Dec. 13, 1991).