Opinion
NO. 2020 KW 1069
12-30-2020
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. SADAT EL-AMIN
In Re: Sadat El-Amin, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 09-CR1-101854. BEFORE: GUIDRY, McCLENDON, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. In Ramos v. Louisiana, ___ U.S.___, ___, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 1397, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020), the United States Supreme Court held, "the Sixth Amendment's unanimity requirement applies to state and federal criminal trials equally." However, the Court declined to address whether its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review. The Court specifically observed that the question of "[w]hether the right to jury unanimity applies to cases on collateral review is a question for a future case where the parties will have a chance to brief the issue and we will benefit from their adversarial presentation." See Ramos, ___ U.S. at ___, 140 S.Ct. at 1407. The question of whether Ramos must apply retroactively to cases on federal collateral review is currently pending before the Court. Edwards v. Vannoy, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 2737, 206 L.Ed.2d 917 (2020). Moreover, the Louisiana Supreme Court has declined to definitively rule on whether Ramos should apply on collateral review in state court proceedings pending a decision in Edwards. See State v. Gipson, 2019-01815 (La. 6/3/20), 296 So.3d 1051, 1052 (Johnson, C.J., dissenting to point out that she disagreed with the majority's decision to defer ruling until the United States Supreme Court mandates action). Therefore, we are constrained to deny relief at this time. However, our decision does not preclude relator from reurging the issue in the district court if warranted by the decision of the higher courts.
JMG
PMc
WIL
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT