From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Eisele

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 30, 2019
578 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 81463

07-30-2019

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeanne M. EISELE, Appellant.

Jedd C. Schneider, Columbia, for appellant. Benjamin J. Miller, Fulton for respondent.


Jedd C. Schneider, Columbia, for appellant.

Benjamin J. Miller, Fulton for respondent.

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Gary D. Witt, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam Jeanne Eisele appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated following a bench trial. She contends the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress and admitting all evidence obtained as a result of the traffic stop because the stop was an unconstitutional seizure. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)


Summaries of

State v. Eisele

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 30, 2019
578 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Eisele

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeanne M. EISELE, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 30, 2019

Citations

578 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)