From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Edwin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 15, 2019
2019-UP-173 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 15, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-173

05-15-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Hakeem Edwin, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-002602

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2019

Appeal From Williamsburg County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Edwin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 15, 2019
2019-UP-173 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 15, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Edwin

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Hakeem Edwin, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 15, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-173 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 15, 2019)