From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Easterling

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
Sep 24, 2001
Case No. CA2001-02-046 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2001)

Opinion

Case No. CA2001-02-046.

September 24, 2001.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Kacy Eaves, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45012-0515, for plaintiff-appellee.

Moser Law Firm, LLC, Brian A. Lee, 1040 Symmes Road, Fairfield, OH 45014, for defendant-appellant.


DECISION


This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

Counsel for defendant-appellant, Edgar Easterling, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists four potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. Therefore, the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

YOUNG, P.J., WALSH and POWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Easterling

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
Sep 24, 2001
Case No. CA2001-02-046 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2001)
Case details for

State v. Easterling

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDGAR EASTERLING, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County

Date published: Sep 24, 2001

Citations

Case No. CA2001-02-046 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2001)