Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

State v. Duteau

68 Conn. App. 248 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
State v. Duteau

15 Citing cases

  1. State v. Qayyum

    344 Conn. 302 (Conn. 2022)   Cited 7 times

    (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Duteau , 68 Conn. App. 248, 256, 791 A.2d 591, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939, 835 A.2d 58 (2002). "[T]he determination of whether a claim has been properly preserved will depend on a careful review of the record to ascertain whether the claim on appeal was articulated [before the trial court] with sufficient clarity to place the trial court on reasonable notice of that very same claim."

  2. State v. Hampton

    293 Conn. 435 (Conn. 2009)   Cited 98 times
    Permitting defendant to file supplemental brief raising new claim in light of new constitutional rule announced in Salamon , which was released after defendant filed initial brief on appeal

    " (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Duteau, 68 Conn. App. 248, 254, 791 A.2d 591, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939, 835 A.2d 58 (2002). II

  3. State v. Duteau

    260 Conn. 939 (Conn. 2002)   Cited 5 times

    Decided May 22, 2002 The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 248 (AC 20047), is denied. Reine C. Boyer, special public defender, in support of the petition.

  4. In re Anthony L.

    194 Conn. App. 111 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019)   Cited 6 times

    (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Duteau , 68 Conn. App. 248, 254, 791 A.2d 591, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939, 835 A.2d 58 (2002). It is undisputed that the record contains no evidence supporting alternatives to the general plan of the petitioner to have the children reside with their grandmother until that is no longer possible, and then with the fictive kin.

  5. State v. Fowler

    178 Conn. App. 332 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017)   Cited 11 times
    Rejecting claims on direct appeal

    The defendant devotes less than one page of his brief to this claim, which provides little more than a factual account of his oral motion to dismiss raised at the violation of probation hearing, and includes neither argument nor analysis of his passing citation to case law. See State v. T.R.D. , 286 Conn. 191, 213–14 n.18, 942 A.2d 1000 (2008) (declining to review claim as inadequately briefed where defendant "devoted a mere three quarters of a page in his brief to [the] claim, and failed to explicate adequately" the basis of his argument); State v. Duteau , 68 Conn. App. 248, 261–62, 791 A.2d 591 (declining to review claim as inadequately briefed where defendant failed to "provide either legal authority or analysis to support this claim"), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939, 835 A.2d 58 (2002). "We are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief.

  6. State v. Patterson

    170 Conn. App. 768 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017)   Cited 12 times
    In Patterson, the witness observed the defendant intruding in his residence, and got a look at the defendant’s face for several seconds.

    (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jorge P. , 308 Conn. 740, 753–54, 66 A.3d 869 (2013) ; see also State v. Duteau , 68 Conn.App. 248, 256, 791 A.2d 591 ("This court shall not be bound to consider a claim unless it was distinctly raised at the trial or arose subsequent to the trial.... Practice Book § 60–5. Appellate review of evidentiary rulings is ordinarily limited to the specific legal issue raised by the objection of trial counsel.... By failing to object ... the defendant failed to preserve this claim.

  7. State v. Patterson

    AC 37982 (Conn. App. Ct. Feb. 15, 2017)

    (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jorge P., 308 Conn. 740, 753-54, 66 A.3d 869 (2013); see also State v. Duteau, 68 Conn. App. 248, 256, 791 A.2d 591 ("This court shall not be bound to consider a claim unless it was distinctly raised at the trial or arose subsequent to the trial. . . . Practice Book § 60-5. Appellate review of evidentiary rulings is ordinarily limited to the specific legal issue raised by the objection of trial counsel.

  8. State v. Burgos

    170 Conn. App. 501 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017)   Cited 11 times
    Requiring vacatur of convictions of sexual assault in first degree and risk of injury to child as lesser included offenses of aggravated sexual assault of a minor, where both lesser included offenses had also served as predicate offenses for greater offense and greater offense remained viable after vacatur of predicate offenses

    State v. Jenkins , 298 Conn. 209, 222, 3 A.3d 806 (2010).Therefore, because any decision made by us concerning the validity of the defendant's consent to search would be entirely speculative without the necessary factual and legal conclusions furnished by the trial court, it is unreviewable under the first prong of Golding . State v. Duteau , 68 Conn.App. 248, 254, 791 A.2d 591 (record inadequate for review of fourth amendment suppression claim where trial court did not issue memorandum of decision, sign the transcript, or make specific factual findings concerning issues on appeal), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939, 835 A.2d 58 (2002) ; State v. Rios , 30 Conn.App. 712, 715–16, 622 A.2d 618 (1993) (same); see State v. Beliveau , supra, 52 Conn.App. at 481–82, 727 A.2d 737 (fifth amendment claim); see also State v. Young , 76 Conn.App. 392, 409, 819 A.2d 884 (record inadequate to review of motion to suppress in-court identification where trial court did not issue a memorandum of decision, sign the transcript, or "make any findings whatsoever regarding the suggestiveness of the arraignment proceedings"), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912, 826 A.2d 1157 (2003).IV

  9. In re Azareon Y.

    139 Conn. App. 457 (Conn. App. Ct. 2012)   Cited 16 times

    (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Duteau, 68 Conn.App. 248, 254, 791 A.2d 591, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939, 835 A.2d 58 (2002). The respondent's claim fails for lack of an adequate record.

  10. State v. Boyd

    89 Conn. App. 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005)   Cited 21 times

    We have reviewed the comments complained of in the context of the entire trial and are satisfied that these comments, individual and in toto, were not so egregious as to infringe on the defendant's right to a fair trial. See State v. Duteau, 68 Conn. App. 248, 260, 791 A.2d 591, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939, 835 A.2d 58 (2002). 1