From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Durham

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 11, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2016-000837 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-149

04-11-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Keylan J. Durham, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Keylan Jabari Durham, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2018

Appeal From Richland County Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Keylan Jabari Durham, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Durham

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 11, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2016-000837 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Durham

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Keylan J. Durham, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 11, 2018

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2016-000837 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2018)