From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Durenleau

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jan 6, 1994
657 A.2d 170 (Vt. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-168

January 6, 1994.

Appeal from District Court of Vermont, Unit No. 2, Chittenden Circuit.


Defendant's alternative motion to remand is denied. Defendant first must bring her motion for new trial before the trial court. After the trial court has considered defendant's claim of newly discovered evidence, the court may either deny the motion or certify to this Court its intention to grant the motion. If the trial court makes the latter certification to this Court, at that time, this Court would consider a new motion to remand by the defendant. See United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 667 n.42 (1984) (detailing procedure under identical terms of Fed. R. Crim. P. 33); see also 3 C. Wright, Federal Practice Procedure § 557, at 338-40 (2d ed. 1982 Supp. 1993) (discussing procedure under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 and collecting cases).


Summaries of

State v. Durenleau

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jan 6, 1994
657 A.2d 170 (Vt. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Durenleau

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Vermont v. Rebecca DURENLEAU

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Jan 6, 1994

Citations

657 A.2d 170 (Vt. 1994)
161 Vt. 602