From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dunson

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Dec 27, 2018
2018 Ohio 5213 (Ohio 2018)

Opinion

No. 2017-0186

12-27-2018

The STATE of Ohio, Appellant, v. DUNSON, Appellee.

Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Meagan D. Woodall and Heather N. Jans, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Patrick T. Clark, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Elizabeth Bonham, Caitlin Hill, Freda J. Levenson, and R. Orion Danjuma, urging affirmance for amici curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.


Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Meagan D. Woodall and Heather N. Jans, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Patrick T. Clark, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Elizabeth Bonham, Caitlin Hill, Freda J. Levenson, and R. Orion Danjuma, urging affirmance for amici curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Braden , ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2018-Ohio-5079, ––– N.E.3d ––––.

O'Donnell, Kennedy, Fischer, DeWine, and DeGenaro, JJ., concur.

O'Connor, C.J., and French, J., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of French, J., in State v. Braden, ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2018-Ohio-5079, ––– N.E.3d ––––, and would address the accepted proposition of law.


Summaries of

State v. Dunson

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Dec 27, 2018
2018 Ohio 5213 (Ohio 2018)
Case details for

State v. Dunson

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DUNSON, APPELLEE.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Date published: Dec 27, 2018

Citations

2018 Ohio 5213 (Ohio 2018)
156 Ohio St. 3d 180
124 N.E.3d 787

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Eckhart v. Hoff

— Respondents having been duly elected, at an election called by the authority of the de facto mayor of the…

Taylor v. Hoya

Since the passage of the Act of 1852 the city has abandoned its special incorporation, and is now…