From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dunn

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Feb 20, 2018
540 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105137

02-20-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Michael DUNN, Appellant.

Garrick F. D. Aplin, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Jedd C. Schneider, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.


Garrick F. D. Aplin, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Jedd C. Schneider, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James M. Dunn ("Defendant") was charged with the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance pursuant to § 195.202. After reviewing the record, we find that (1) the trial court did not plainly err by failing to strike certain testimony sua sponte and (2) there was sufficient evidence to establish that Defendant "possessed" methamphetamine and he was aware of the nature and character of the illegal substance. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Dunn

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Feb 20, 2018
540 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Michael DUNN, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Feb 20, 2018

Citations

540 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)