Opinion
No. 38520.
Filed December 8, 1972.
Criminal Law: Sentences: Appeal and Error. A sentence imposed within statutory limits will not ordinarily be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of judicial discretion.
Appeal from the district court for Gage County: WILLIAM B. RIST, Judge. Affirmed.
Bauer, Galter Scott and Paul E. Galter, for appellant.
Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Calvin E. Robinson, for appellee.
Heard before WHITE, C. J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, NEWTON, and CLINTON, JJ.
The defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of assault and battery. He was sentenced to 90 days in the county jail. The only issue on appeal is his claim that the sentence was excessive.
The record reveals that defendant attacked the victim with a 14-inch wrench which had a sharp edge on it. The victim had two cuts on his head which required stitches. Under a plea bargain, the original charge of felonious assault was amended to the misdemeanor charge here and the defendant pleaded guilty. In addition, the defendant's previous record shows multiple misdemeanor convictions, at least one of which was a conviction for assault and battery. It also includes at least one violation of probation. See State v. Duitsman, 186 Neb. 39, 180 N.W.2d 685.
The authorized penalties here include a jail sentence not exceeding 6 months. See 28-411, R. S. Supp., 1972. The 90-day sentence demonstrates the exercise of sound judicial discretion. The appeal here is utterly frivolous. A sentence imposed within statutory limits will not ordinarily be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of judicial discretion. State v. Ernest, 188 Neb. 648, 198 N.W.2d 335.
AFFIRMED.