From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Duggan

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Aug 18, 2021
314 Or. App. 106 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A170293

08-18-2021

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Steven Ray DUGGAN, aka Stephen Duggan, aka Steven Duggan, Defendant-Appellant.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Daniel Bennett, and Erik Blumenthal, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Joseph Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Daniel Bennett, and Erik Blumenthal, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Joseph Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Sercombe, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on one count of delivery of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a school (Count 1), which was merged with one count of delivery of methamphetamine (Count 2), and two counts of possession of methamphetamine (Counts 3 and 4). He first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions to controvert and suppress; we reject those arguments without discussion. He also argues that the trial court plainly erred in failing to merge the guilty verdicts on the two counts of possession of methamphetamine into a single conviction. He did not preserve his merger argument, but requests that this court review and correct the error as plain error. ORAP 5.45(1). The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred by failing to merge Counts 3 and 4. We agree with and accept the state's concession. We further conclude that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the plain error for the reasons stated in State v. Camacho-Alvarez , 225 Or. App. 215, 217, 200 P.3d 613 (2009).

Convictions on Counts 3 and 4 reversed and remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for one count of unlawful possession of methamphetamine; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Duggan

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Aug 18, 2021
314 Or. App. 106 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Duggan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN RAY DUGGAN, aka Stephen…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

314 Or. App. 106 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
493 P.3d 578