From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Down

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 21, 1993
856 P.2d 645 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

91C-20972; CA A73663

Argued and submitted March 31, affirmed August 18, reconsideration denied October 27, petition for review denied December 21, 1993 ( 318 Or. 246)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Duane R. Ertsgaard, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Amy E. Alpaugh, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Defendant was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, after he entered into a plea agreement. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in calculating his criminal history. Under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. See State v. Adams, 315 Or. 359, 847 P.2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or. App. 462, 852 P.2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or. App. 165, 851 P.2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Down

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 21, 1993
856 P.2d 645 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Down

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK ANTHONY DOWN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 21, 1993

Citations

856 P.2d 645 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
856 P.2d 645