Opinion
1 CA-CR 22-0615 PRPC
06-01-2023
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY, Petitioner.
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Douglas Gerlach Counsel for Respondent Law Office of Brent E. Graham, PLLC, Flagstaff By Brent E. Graham Counsel for Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR1992-001232-A The Honorable Joseph Kreamer, Judge
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Douglas Gerlach Counsel for Respondent
Law Office of Brent E. Graham, PLLC, Flagstaff By Brent E. Graham Counsel for Petitioner
Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Michael S. Catlett, and Judge Jennifer B. Campbell delivered the decision of the Court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIUM:
¶1 Petitioner Johnathan Andrew Doody seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is his second petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for review, the state's response and petitioner's reply. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review and deny relief.