From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Donahue

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 17, 1998
151 Or. App. 704 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

C9502-31026; CA A90121

Argued and submitted September 29, 1997

Compensatory fine vacated; otherwise affirmed December 17, 1997 Petition for review denied February 17, 1998 ( 326 Or. 465)

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Harl Haas, Judge.

Diane L. Alessi, Chief Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.


PER CURIAM


Compensatory fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentencing for first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in allowing a state's witness to testify to a medical diagnosis of the victim of sexual abuse and that the trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine. We vacate the compensatory fine and otherwise affirm.

A compensatory fine may be awarded only if the trial court finds that the victim suffered a pecuniary loss. State v. Barkley, 315 Or. 420, 438, 846 P.2d 390, cert den 510 U.S. 837 (1993); State v. Forrester, 130 Or. App. 459, 462, 882 P.2d 1124 (1994). Here, no evidence was submitted that the victim suffered a pecuniary loss, and the trial court expressly found that there was no pecuniary loss.

Compensatory fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Donahue

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 17, 1998
151 Or. App. 704 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Donahue

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM JOHN DONAHUE, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 17, 1998

Citations

151 Or. App. 704 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)
950 P.2d 416

Citing Cases

State v. Donahue

We said in our original opinion that "no evidence was submitted that the victim suffered a pecuniary loss,…