Opinion
No. 1 CA-CR 18-0660 PRPC
12-04-2018
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. AARON JUSTIN DOCHOFF, Petitioner.
COUNSEL Coconino County Attorney's Office, Flagstaff By Mark Huston Counsel for Respondent Aaron Justin Dochoff, Florence Petitioner
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
Appeal from the Superior Court in Coconino County
No. S0300CR20010973
The Honorable Dan R. Slayton, Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED
COUNSEL
Coconino County Attorney's Office, Flagstaff
By Mark Huston
Counsel for Respondent
Aaron Justin Dochoff, Florence
Petitioner
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop and Judge Jon W. Thompson delivered the decision of the Court.
PER CURIAM:
¶1 Petitioner Aaron Justin Dochoff seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's second successive petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has the burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. We hold that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.