State v. Diersen

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Brant

    436 N.W.2d 468 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that the critical inquiry is the "practical relation between the confession and the government's case, rather than the theoretical relation to the definition of the offense."

    If statutory criteria are not met, the evidence is not admissible, and therefore the trial court clearly erred in admitting the transcript. State v. Diersen, 356 N.W.2d 710 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984). However, appellant makes no cognizable claim that his constitutional rights have been violated.