From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Diaz-Tomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 2, 2021
853 S.E.2d 902 (N.C. 2021)

Opinion

54A19-3

03-02-2021

STATE v. Rogelio Albino DIAZ-TOMAS

Anton M. Lebedev, Attorney at Law, For Diaz-Tomas, Rogelio Albino. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C. Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, For State of N.C. Erwin Byrd, Attorney at Law, For NC Advocates for Justice. Thomas K. Maher, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, For NC Advocates for Justice. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney.


Anton M. Lebedev, Attorney at Law, For Diaz-Tomas, Rogelio Albino.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Erwin Byrd, Attorney at Law, For NC Advocates for Justice.

Thomas K. Maher, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, For NC Advocates for Justice.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of March 2021 by North Carolina Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of March 2021."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).

Berger, J. recused


Summaries of

State v. Diaz-Tomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 2, 2021
853 S.E.2d 902 (N.C. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Diaz-Tomas

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. Rogelio Albino DIAZ-TOMAS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Mar 2, 2021

Citations

853 S.E.2d 902 (N.C. 2021)