From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Delafield

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1
Aug 2, 2021
No. 82257-8-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2021)

Opinion

82257-8-I

08-02-2021

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHN STUART DELAFIELD, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM

John Delafield appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of RCW 69.50.4013(1). Delafield contends, and the State concedes, that Delafield's conviction must be vacated under State v. Blake, in which our Supreme Court held RCW 69.50.4013(1) unconstitutional and, thus, void. 197 Wn.2d 170, 195, 481 P.3d 521 (2021). We accept the State's concession, reverse Delafield's conviction, and remand to the trial court to vacate the conviction. Additionally, because the State represents that it will not file a motion for reconsideration or a petition for review, we grant the State's request for an expedited mandate and direct the clerk to issue the mandate as soon as is feasible. See RAP 12.5(b) ("The clerk of the Court of Appeals will issue the mandate for a Court of Appeals decision terminating review upon stipulation of the parties that no motion for reconsideration or petition for review will be filed.").

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Delafield

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1
Aug 2, 2021
No. 82257-8-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Delafield

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHN STUART DELAFIELD, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1

Date published: Aug 2, 2021

Citations

No. 82257-8-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2021)