From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Deaner

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 26, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-472 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-472

10-26-2011

The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Lee Deaner, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Charleston County

Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Christopher Lee Deaner appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion to dismiss, arguing the circuit court erred in refusing to dismiss the charges against him under the Interstate Agreement on Detainer Act (IAD) when the State failed to bring the case to trial or move for a continuance within 180 days from the time Deaner requested final disposition of his outstanding warrant. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Tucker, 376 S.C. 412, 418, 656 S.E.2d 403, 406-07 (Ct. App. 2008) (holding that by proceeding with a guilty plea, a defendant implicitly waives "any and all defects regarding his return to state custody under the IAD").

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Deaner

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 26, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-472 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

State v. Deaner

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Lee Deaner, Appellant.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-472 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2011)