From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Day

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 16, 2003
122 S.W.3d 717 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 83024

December 16, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Larry Kendrick.

Paul B. Day, Algoa Correctional Center, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. Nixon, Charnette D. Douglass, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall Jr., J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER

Paul B. Day ("Day") appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct a manifest injustice, which was filed pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.07. Day claims that his guilty plea to the charge of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (1996), was involuntarily made. Additionally, Day claims that his guilty plea was not made with an understanding of the charges because he was charged with one crime and sentenced for another.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Day

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 16, 2003
122 S.W.3d 717 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Day

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. PAUL B. DAY, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Dec 16, 2003

Citations

122 S.W.3d 717 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)