From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 7, 1989
541 So. 2d 831 (La. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-K-3138.

April 7, 1989.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number KA-6854; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. "B", Number 306-272.


Granted. The case is remanded to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of the entire jury charge given by the trial court. If the trial court properly instructed the jurors that the state had the burden of proving every essential element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970); La.C.Cr.P. art. 804, the court of appeal should consider whether the facts necessarily found by the jury in its verdict satisfy the due process standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), see, State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676 (La. 1984), and whether any ambiguity in the trial court's charge on circumstantial evidence was harmless error. See, Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 107 S.Ct. 1918, 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987); Rose v. Clark, 478 U.S. 570, 106 S.Ct. 3101, 92 L.Ed.2d 460 (1986).


Summaries of

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 7, 1989
541 So. 2d 831 (La. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. EUGENE DAVIS, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Apr 7, 1989

Citations

541 So. 2d 831 (La. 1989)

Citing Cases

State v. McLemore

In reviewing jury charges the court of appeal must consider whether any potential ambiguity in the trial…

State v. Flowers

In reviewing jury charges the court of appeal must consider whether any potential ambiguity in the trial…