From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 6, 1991
579 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2631.

May 15, 1991. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Martin County; Paul B. Kanarek, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The state challenges the trial court's imposition of a sentence below the recommended guidelines. The trial court gave oral reasons but failed to reduce them to writing. Because the court failed to give written reasons, we must reverse for entry of a sentence within the guidelines range. This is the holding of Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990) which we are required to follow, especially since Pope specifically receded from that portion of Barbera v. State, 505 So.2d 413 (Fla. 1987) which on remand had permitted the trial court to provide written reasons for a downward departure sentence when none had been prepared at the initial sentencing. Parenthetically, the orally announced reason for departing downward from the guidelines sentence in this case was the same as in Barbera.

Reversed and remanded.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 6, 1991
579 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. JAMES DAVIS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 6, 1991

Citations

579 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

State v. Birkigt

Therefore, we reverse Birkigt's sentence and remand for entry of a sentence within the guidelines range.…