From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 1043 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 2017 KW 1043

10-02-2017

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. RIP DAN DAVIS


In Re: Rip Dan Davis, applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 86,028. BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. A writ of habeas corpus may not be used for complaints challenging either a conviction or sentence, for which the legislature has provided other procedural vehicles, such as the motion for reconsideration of sentence, appeal, and the motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Madison v. Ward, 2000-2842 (La. App. 1st Cir. 7/3/02), 825 So.2d 1245, 1251 (en banc). Furthermore, relator's manslaughter sentence was not imposed with any restrictions. As was noted in this court's opinion on relator's appeal, although the sentencing minutes indicated the trial court imposed relator's sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, the sentencing transcript did not reflect that relator's sentence was imposed without these benefits. Accordingly, this court remanded relator's case to the district court with instructions to correct the sentencing minutes. See State v. Davis, 2000-1728 (La. App. 1st Cir. 5/11/01), 798 So.2d 334, writ denied, 2001-1987 (La. 3/28/02), 812 So.2d 654.

GH

AHP

TMH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Davis

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 1043 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. RIP DAN DAVIS

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 2, 2017

Citations

NO. 2017 KW 1043 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2017)