From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Nov 6, 2015
SCWC-12-0001121 (Haw. Nov. 6, 2015)

Summary

holding that Intoxilyzer 8000 Accuracy Tests were admissible under Hawai‘i Rules of Evidence ("HRE") Rule 803(b) and 902 as self-authenticating public records

Summary of this case from State v. Ferreira

Opinion

SCWC-12-0001121

11-06-2015

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAYMOND S. DAVIS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

John M. Tonaki and Phyllis J. Hironaka for petitioner


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-12-0001121; CASE NO. 1DTA-12-01623)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
()

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Raymond S. Davis's Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on September 24, 2015, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 6, 2015. John M. Tonaki and Phyllis J. Hironaka for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

State v. Davis

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Nov 6, 2015
SCWC-12-0001121 (Haw. Nov. 6, 2015)

holding that Intoxilyzer 8000 Accuracy Tests were admissible under Hawai‘i Rules of Evidence ("HRE") Rule 803(b) and 902 as self-authenticating public records

Summary of this case from State v. Ferreira
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAYMOND S. DAVIS…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Nov 6, 2015

Citations

SCWC-12-0001121 (Haw. Nov. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

State v. Ferreira

(1) The District Court did not err by taking judicial notice that CMI, Inc. was the manufacturer of the…