From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jan 10, 2013
353 Or. 166 (Or. 2013)

Opinion

(CC 074242MI; CA A137633 SC S059147).

2013-01-10

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Buck Wade DAVIS, Petitioner on Review.

On review from the Court of Appeals. * Kenneth A. Kreuscher, Portland Law Collective, LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review. With him on the brief was Travis Eiva. Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. With him on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.


On review from the Court of Appeals.
Kenneth A. Kreuscher, Portland Law Collective, LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review. With him on the brief was Travis Eiva. Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. With him on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Kendra M. Matthews, Ransom Blackman LLP, Portland, filed the brief for amicus curiae ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Inc.

Before BALMER, Chief Justice, KISTLER, WALTERS, and LINDER, Justices, and DURHAM and De MUNIZ, Senior Judges, Justices pro tempore.

Appeal from Jackson County Circuit Court, Ron D. Grensky, Judge. 237 Or.App. 351, 239 P.3d 1002 (2010).

Landau, Brewer, and Baldwin, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed by an equally divided court.


Summaries of

State v. Davis

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jan 10, 2013
353 Or. 166 (Or. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. BUCK WADE DAVIS, Petitioner on…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 10, 2013

Citations

353 Or. 166 (Or. 2013)
295 P.3d 617

Citing Cases

State v. Hemenway

The majority summarily rejects the state's argument. State v. Hemenway, 353 Or. 129, 136–38, 295 P.3d 617…

State v. Gasperetti

We review a trial court's legal conclusions under Article I, section 20, for errors of law. State v. Davis,…