Opinion
No. ED 106741
09-10-2019
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael R. DAVIS, Appellant.
FOR APPELLANT, Timothy J. Smith, 2611 South Big Bend Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63143, Steven Kratky, Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
FOR APPELLANT, Timothy J. Smith, 2611 South Big Bend Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63143, Steven Kratky, Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J. and Lisa P. Page, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM Michael R. Davis ("Defendant") appeals his conviction after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. On appeal, Defendant claims an exhibit was entered despite being inadmissible for numerous reasons. Defendant also claims the trial court erred in allowed the State to attempt to shift the burden onto two alibi witnesses testifying on Defendant’s behalf. Defendant has failed to show the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the exhibit into evidence and has failed to show the trial court plainly erred in failing to intervene or find prosecutorial misconduct. Therefore, Defendant’s points on appeal are denied, and we affirm the trial court’s judgment of conviction and sentence. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 30.25(b) (2018).