From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davies

COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
May 18, 2020
2020 Ohio 2993 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2019-A-0067

05-18-2020

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT R. DAVIES, Defendant-Appellant.

Cecilia M. Cooper, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, and Shelley M. Pratt, Assistant Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, Ohio 44047 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). Robert Davies, pro se, 7455 Harmon Road, Conneaut, Ohio 44030. (Defendant-Appellant).


OPINION

Civil Appeal from the Ashtabula County Court, Western District, Case No. 2017 MI 00025 W. Judgment: Affirmed. Cecilia M. Cooper, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, and Shelley M. Pratt, Assistant Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, Ohio 44047 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). Robert Davies, pro se, 7455 Harmon Road, Conneaut, Ohio 44030. (Defendant-Appellant). THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.

{¶1} Appellant, Robert R. Davies, was convicted of a misdemeanor in April 2000. Twelve years later, due to a flawed complaint, his conviction was vacated and the case was dismissed. Appellant therefore moved for reimbursement of fines and costs which was overruled. Appellant did not appeal.

{¶2} Thereafter, appellant moved the trial court to vacate its order overruling his motion for reimbursement. That motion was overruled and appellant appeals assigning the following as error:

{¶3} "The trial court erred in denying appellant's motion to vacate the judgment denying return of fines and court costs."

{¶4} Appellant could have appealed the trial court's order denying his motion for reimbursement, but did not. Res judicata bars litigating in any proceeding, except a direct appeal, any defense or claimed lack of due process that could have been raised on direct appeal. State v. Hall, 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 2008-T-0051, 2009-Ohio-6379, ¶ 33, quoting State v. Szefcyk, 77 Ohio St.3d 93, 671 N.E.2d 233 (1996), syllabus. Stated otherwise, a motion to vacate may not be used as a substitute for appeal. State v. Weese, 9th Dist. Medina Nos. 2742-M and 2760-M, 1998 WL 239977 (May 13, 1998). Moreover, reimbursement of fines and costs after reversal and dismissal is a due process issue. Nelson v. Colorado,137 S.Ct. 1249, 197 L.Ed.2d 611 (2017).

{¶5} Because appellant's motion to vacate is barred by res judicata, his assignment of error lacks merit. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. MATT LYNCH, J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Davies

COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
May 18, 2020
2020 Ohio 2993 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Davies

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT R. DAVIES…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO

Date published: May 18, 2020

Citations

2020 Ohio 2993 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)