From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davidson

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 10, 1966
419 P.2d 942 (Or. 1966)

Opinion

Argued October 6, 1966

Affirmed November 10, 1966

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

PAUL R. HARRIS, Judge.

R. Dale Kneeland, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, and George M. Joseph, Deputy District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, GOODWIN, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.


The defendant appeals from a conviction of the crime of unlawfully selling shares of the capital stock of a corporation which had not been registered with the Oregon Corporation Commissioner, in violation of ORS 59.130. Defendant's sole contention is that he is entitled to reversal because the court denied his motion for a continuance. There is no proper assignment of error in the brief as required by Rule 19. The motion for continuance is not set out in substance, or otherwise. Rule 19 provides: "Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching the record for the proceedings complained of will not be considered." This is such a case and we will not consider the alleged error.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Davidson

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 10, 1966
419 P.2d 942 (Or. 1966)
Case details for

State v. Davidson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON v. RAYMOND DAVIDSON

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Nov 10, 1966

Citations

419 P.2d 942 (Or. 1966)
419 P.2d 942

Citing Cases

State v. Newton

Therefore, we take no notice of that assignment of error. State v. Davidson, 244 Or. 636, 419 P.2d 942…