State v. Davidson

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Davidson

    No. M2017-00598-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 7, 2018)

    His convictions were affirmed on appeal. State v. Ricardo Davidson, No. M2010-02002-CCA-R3-CD, 2012 WL 1795147 (Tenn. Crim. App. May 17, 2012), perm. to app. denied (Tenn. Aug. 16, 2012). The Appellant was unsuccessful in his subsequent pursuit of post-conviction and habeas corpus relief. Ricardo Davidson v. State, No. M2013-01645-CCA-R3-PC, 2014 WL 3765710 (Tenn. Crim. App. July 31, 2014), perm to app. denied (Tenn. Nov. 20, 2014); Ricardo Davidson v. Avril Chapman, Warden, No. M2014-00565-CCA-R3-HC, 2014 WL 7011499 (Tenn. Crim. App., Dec. 12, 2014).

  2. Davidson v. Chapman

    No. M2014-00565-CCA-R3-HC (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 12, 2014)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that although the delivery and sale of a controlled substance must be charged separately, the indictment was not duplicitous for charging possession with intent to sell or deliver, "which is a single, independent offense with its own subpart"

    The court sentenced him to a total effective sentence of fifteen years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On direct appeal, this court affirmed his convictions and sentences, and his application for permission to appeal to the supreme court was subsequently denied. See State v. Ricardo Davidson, No. M2010-02002-CCA-R3-CD, 2012 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 333 (Nashville, May 17, 2012). Thereafter, the petitioner filed for post-conviction relief, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

  3. Davidson v. State

    No. M2013-01645-CCA-R3-PC (Tenn. Crim. App. Jul. 31, 2014)   Cited 3 times

    The [petitioner] filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the search warrants.State v. Ricardo Davidson, No. M2010-02002-CCA-R3-CD, 2012 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 333, *2 (Tenn. Crim. App. May 17, 2012), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Aug. 16, 2012).