From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dansie

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Apr 17, 2017
No. 76133-I (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2017)

Opinion

76133-I

04-17-2017

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BRIAN DANSIE, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Brian Dansie has filed a motion for discretionary review of trial court orders denying his motion to vacate the record of his criminal conviction. The State of Washington filed a motion to concede error and remand for a new hearing. Dansie filed an answer to the State's motion, and the State has filed a reply.

The motion for discretionary review is granted. We also accept the State's concession of error in part, accelerate review, and remand. On remand, the trial court is directed to clarify on the record the "good cause" reason for denying the motion to vacate under RCW 9.94A.640. We decline Dansie's request that the matter be remanded for a new hearing before a different judge.

Remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

State v. Dansie

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Apr 17, 2017
No. 76133-I (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Dansie

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BRIAN DANSIE, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Apr 17, 2017

Citations

No. 76133-I (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Dansie

2017-04-17 The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Brian Dansie, Appellant. 177 A.D. 92213 Misc. 363123 Ohio…