From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dangerfield

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Oct 31, 1984
459 So. 2d 171 (La. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 16662-KW.

October 31, 1984.

APPEAL FROM SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, JACKSON PARISH, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE LEON H. WHITTEN, J.

Culpepper, Teat, Caldwell Avery by Jimmy C. Teat, Jonesboro, for appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, John C. Blake, Dist. Atty., Jonesboro, for appellee.

Before MARVIN, JASPER E. JONES and FRED W. JONES, Jr., JJ.


We granted a writ of review and ordered the record of Dangerfield's conviction of DWI 2d offense to be filed in this court.

This record clearly shows that the trial court erred in admitting, over defendant's objection, the results of a test made of defendant's blood by a medical technician without first requiring the State to show that the technician held a valid permit to administer such a test and that the test was made in accord with the procedures and techniques officially promulgated by the Department of Public Safety. LRS 32:663, 664. State v. Junell, 308 So.2d 780 (La. 1975); State v. Bruins, 315 So.2d 293 (La. 1975); State v. Krause, 405 So.2d 832 (La. 1981).

Under these circumstances, the conviction must be reversed and the case must be remanded to allow defendant to be retried. State v. Gregory, 403 So.2d 1225 (La. 1981); State v. Morrison, 392 So.2d 1037 (La. 1980).

The other assignments of error need not be considered.

REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Dangerfield

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Oct 31, 1984
459 So. 2d 171 (La. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Dangerfield

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA, APPELLEE, v. KING EDWARD DANGERFIELD, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1984

Citations

459 So. 2d 171 (La. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Blake

The failure to introduce into evidence the permit held by Trooper Childress was reversible error. State v.…