From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dana

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Oct 21, 1988
548 A.2d 1390 (Me. 1988)

Opinion

Argued September 6, 1988.

Decided October 21, 1988.

Michael E. Povich, Dist. Atty., Mark L. Randall (orally), Asst. Dist. Atty., Calais, for plaintiff.

Michael J. Burns (orally), Bridgton, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and HORNBY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The State appeals pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A(1) (1979) from an order of the Superior Court (Washington County, Silsby, J.) suppressing the results of a breath test administered to defendant because of the failure of a police officer to appear as a witness at the time of hearing. We find no abuse of discretion on the facts set forth in this record. See State v. Mason, 408 A.2d 1269, 1272 (Me. 1979).

The entry is:

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Dana

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Oct 21, 1988
548 A.2d 1390 (Me. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Dana

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Laura M. DANA

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Oct 21, 1988

Citations

548 A.2d 1390 (Me. 1988)