From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dailey

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 29, 2016
185 Wn. 2d 1036 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

NO. 92844–4

06-29-2016

State of Washington, Respondent, v. Henry and Catherine Dailey, et al., Petitioners.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Owens, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 28, 2016, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied and the Respondent's request for attorney fees is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court . For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Dailey

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 29, 2016
185 Wn. 2d 1036 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Dailey

Case Details

Full title:State of Washington, Respondent, v. Henry and Catherine Dailey, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

185 Wn. 2d 1036 (Wash. 2016)
185 Wn. 2d 1036
185 Wash. 2d 1036