From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dailey

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Oct 5, 2010
ID No. 0210012813 (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 5, 2010)

Opinion

ID No. 0210012813.

October 5, 2010.

James D. Nutter, Esquire, Mooney Nutter, P. A., Georgetown, DE.

Paula T. Ryan, Esquire, Department of Justice, Georgetown, DE.


Dear Counsel:

Yesterday, October 4, 2010, I had the opportunity to review the Motion for Modification of Sentence based on a terminal medical condition filed by Mr. Nutteron behalf of Mr. Dailey. It was filed on September 29, 2010.

The matters raised in the Motion are sensitive to both the Defendant and his family, but as should have been done in the Lockerbie bombing case, due diligence is appropriate before acting upon the Motion.

The Department of Correction has reported that Mr. Dailey's condition is vastly improved and they could not support a Motion for Modification based upon imminent demise. Furthermore, they report that the Hospice he is involved in, is not Hospice as we know it but Hospice which is involved with all patients with serious illnesses in the infirmary.

Based upon this information from the Department of Correction, I am not going to act on any type of emergency extraordinary circumstances and the Motion is denied. I am copying this to the warden in the event there is a deterioration in Mr. Dailey's condition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

State v. Dailey

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Oct 5, 2010
ID No. 0210012813 (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 5, 2010)
Case details for

State v. Dailey

Case Details

Full title:State of Delaware v. Donald Dailey, Sr., Defendant

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County

Date published: Oct 5, 2010

Citations

ID No. 0210012813 (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 5, 2010)