From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Daigle

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Dec 23, 1991
593 So. 2d 676 (La. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. K91-1407.

December 23, 1991.

APPEAL FROM JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE R. D. COX, J.

Joseph Daigle, pro se.

J. Nathan Stansbury, Dist Atty., Lafayette, for the State.

Before GUIDRY, DOUCET and YELVERTON, JJ.


La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 provides the jurisdictional time limits for filing an application for post-conviction relief. The trial court has no authority to extend those limits beyond the delays provided by the legislature. Therefore, the trial court was correct in denying relator's motion for extension of time and his application for post-conviction relief.

Further, the trial court did not err in denying relator's request for transcripts as he has failed to show a particularized need. Relator's request for a stay of the proceedings is likewise denied.


Summaries of

State v. Daigle

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Dec 23, 1991
593 So. 2d 676 (La. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Daigle

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JOSEPH DAIGLE

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Dec 23, 1991

Citations

593 So. 2d 676 (La. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

State v. Matthews

Moreover, as the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal has explained, "[t]he [district] court does not…

State v. Thomas

This time bar is jurisdictional and "[t]he trial court has no authority to extend those time limits beyond…