From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Daigle

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 22, 1977
353 So. 2d 287 (La. 1977)

Opinion

No. 61225.

December 22, 1977.

In re: Renee Y. Daigle applying for writ of certiorari and review. Evangeline Parish.


Writ refused. No error.

TATE, J., concurs: La.C.Cr.P. art. 230.1 (1977) requires an accused to be brought before the judge within 72 hours for purposes of appointment of counsel. An accused is entitled to be released forthwith until counsel is secured, if no appointment is made. Here the right to be released is moot, since counsel has been secured. The remedy for violation is exclusion of any statement secured when counsel should have been but was not afforded.

DIXON, J., would grant. The legislature has clearly provided that the sanction for the violation of 230.1 of C.Cr.P. is the immediate release of the defendant. This ruling ignores the plain words and clear intent of the statute.

CALOGERO, J., is of the view the writ should be granted. The law is unequivocal.

DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.


Summaries of

State v. Daigle

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 22, 1977
353 So. 2d 287 (La. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Daigle

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. RENEE Y. DAIGLE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Dec 22, 1977

Citations

353 So. 2d 287 (La. 1977)

Citing Cases

State v. Durio

It should be noted that at least one Justice of this Court, my brother Justice Tate, believes that the remedy…

State v. Chaney

For cases finding this issue moot because it was raised in the context of subsequent proceedings, see State…