Opinion
A163250
12-20-2017
In the Matter of D. A. R., a Person Alleged to have a Mental Illness. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. D. A. R., Appellant.
Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Dustin Buehler, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Dustin Buehler, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to advise him of the possible results of the proceeding in accordance with ORS 426.100(1). Specifically, appellant contends that the trial court plainly erred when it did not advise him that those possible results included voluntary treatment or conditional release. Under our recent decisions in State v. M. M. , 288 Or.App. 111, 405 P.3d 192 (2017), and State v. M. S. R. , 288 Or.App. 156, 403 P.3d 809 (2017), appellant is correct that the trial court plainly erred. Further, for the reasons stated in those cases, we exercise our discretion to correct the error. Our disposition of the second assignment of error obviates the need to address appellant's remaining assignment of error.
Reversed.