From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cushard

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 15, 2016
138 A.3d 286 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

06-15-2016

STATE of Connecticut v. Robert CUSHARD.

Daniel J. Krisch, assigned counsel, Hartford, in support of the petition. James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Daniel J. Krisch, assigned counsel, Hartford, in support of the petition.

James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 164 Conn.App. 832, 137 A.3d 926 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the first canvass of the defendant by the trial court was inadequate and therefore the defendant did not waive his right to counsel as a result, but that a second canvass was adequate to waive the defendant's right to counsel?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Cushard

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 15, 2016
138 A.3d 286 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Cushard

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Robert CUSHARD.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

138 A.3d 286 (Conn. 2016)
321 Conn. 926

Citing Cases

State v. Cushard

Id., at 856–57, 137 A.3d 926.We thereafter granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from…