From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Curtis

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 28, 1993
863 S.W.2d 6 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63436.

September 28, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, FRANKLIN COUNTY; JOHN C. BRACKMANN JUDGE.

I.I. Lamke, Washington, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David B. Cosgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals his convictions for second degree burglary and stealing. We find the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to support Defendant's convictions. We further find the trial court's denial of Defendant's suppression motion was not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A written opinion has been furnished the parties, for their information only.


Summaries of

State v. Curtis

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 28, 1993
863 S.W.2d 6 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Curtis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID L. CURTIS, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 28, 1993

Citations

863 S.W.2d 6 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)