From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Curths

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 17, 2007
169 P.3d 1277 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 01C10356; A114189.

Submitted on record and briefs September 7, 2007.

October 17, 2007.

Appeal from the Marion County Circuit Court, Robert J. Morgan, Senior Judge. (Judgment of Dismissal)

Richard D. Barber, Judge. (Supplemental Judgment)

Arlen Porter Smith filed the brief pro se.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondents.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Supplemental money judgment for filing fees reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.


Plaintiff-relator appeals a judgment of dismissal of his alternative writ of mandamus and a supplemental money judgment for filing fees that previously had been deferred. We reject without discussion plaintiff-relator's argument that the court erred in dismissing the writ. Plaintiff-relator argues that the court erred in entering the supplemental judgment without making a determination that he had the ability to pay the fees. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We accept that concession. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719, 720, 16 P3d 1184 (2000) (in mandamus action, trial court erred in requiring plaintiff-relator to pay previously deferred filing fees).

Supplemental money judgment for filing fees reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Curths

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 17, 2007
169 P.3d 1277 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Curths

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel ARLEN PORTER SMITH, Relator-Appellant, v. Calvin CURTHS…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 2007

Citations

169 P.3d 1277 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
169 P.3d 1277