From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Currier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 6, 1986
504 A.2d 617 (Me. 1986)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1986.

Decided February 6, 1986.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Somerset County.

David W. Crook, Dist. Atty., John Alsop (orally), Asst. Dist. Atty., Skowhegan, for the State.

Hyde, Day Ferris, William Thomas Hyde (orally), Skowhegan, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Asserting insufficiency of the evidence, Daniel H. Currier appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Somerset County, of burglary and theft ( 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 and 353 (1983)). The record discloses that Currier was apprehended in the immediate vicinity of the burglarized building and in close proximity to articles removed therefrom in circumstances warranting a rational conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty as charged. That evidence was sufficient.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Currier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 6, 1986
504 A.2d 617 (Me. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Currier

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Daniel H. CURRIER

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Feb 6, 1986

Citations

504 A.2d 617 (Me. 1986)