Opinion
No. 03-08-00259-CR
Filed: February 27, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Travis County, No. C-1-Cr-05-713701, Honorable J. David Phillips, Judge Presiding. Vacated and Remanded.
Before Justices PURYEAR, PEMBERTON and WALDROP.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By complaint filed in the City of Austin municipal court, the State charged John Francis Curran III with violating a city ordinance that bans solicitation between pedestrians and occupants of motor vehicles. Curran filed a motion to quash the complaint on grounds that, among others, the ordinance violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; Article 1, Section 8 of the Texas Constitution; and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. On July 22, 2005, the municipal court granted the motion to quash and rendered judgment dismissing the cause, holding that "the ordinance at issue is overly broad and not narrowly tailored and is therefore unconstitutional." The State appealed the judgment to the county court-at-law. On March 20, 2008, the county court-at-law issued an opinion and judgment affirming the municipal court's judgment. The State appealed the county court-at-law's judgment to this Court. After this Court set the appeal for oral argument, Curran filed an unopposed motion for "leave to withdraw appellee's motion to quash filed below and to dismiss this appeal." According to Curran, the parties had reached an agreement to resolve the matter and, to that end, he sought leave to withdraw his motion to quash. On December 9, 2008, we granted Curran's motion and abated this appeal to permit him to withdraw his motion to quash. We further directed the parties to advise the Court when the motion to quash was withdrawn. On February 10, 2009, Curran advised us that the municipal court had granted his motion to withdraw his motion to quash on the preceding day, and has furnished us a copy of the signed order. As this order renders moot the controversy that gave rise to this appeal, we vacate the municipal court's July 22, 2005 judgment and the county court-at-law's March 20, 2008 judgment, dismiss this appeal, and remand to the municipal court for any further proceedings.